WN
WABASH NATIONAL Corp (WNC)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue of $380.9M and adjusted diluted EPS of $(0.58) both missed consensus; GAAP EPS was $5.36 due to a $342M legal gain from a reduced verdict . Revenue fell 26.1% year over year and gross margin compressed to 5.0% on weaker Transportation Solutions demand and labor inefficiencies .
- Management cut FY25 guidance to ~$1.8B revenue and adjusted EPS range of $(0.85)–$(0.35), citing tariff-related uncertainty that is delaying customers’ CapEx and slowing order flow; backlog ended Q1 at ~$1.2B (seq +5%, YoY −32%) .
- Parts & Services grew revenue 5.5% YoY to $52.0M, with continued momentum in Trailers as a Service (TaaS) and upfit, while segment margins declined vs prior year on mix; Transportation Solutions posted an operating loss .
- Near-term catalysts: clarity on tariffs/regulation, stabilization of order activity, and execution on Parts & Services/TaaS initiatives (including TrailerHawk.ai integration and UP.Labs AI tools) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Parts & Services delivered sequential and year-over-year revenue growth to $52.0M, supported by doubled upfit volumes and expanding TaaS fleet (>1,000 trailers deployed) .
- Strategic progress in technology and services: acquisition of TrailerHawk.ai to enhance cargo security and TaaS, and UP.Labs partnership to build AI-powered configuration and parts intelligence tools .
- Backlog held at ~$1.2B (seq +5%), providing visibility despite industry uncertainty; management emphasized long-term tailwinds from potential revitalization of U.S. manufacturing .
Management quotes:
- “Non-GAAP adjusted EPS was $(0.58)…revenue came in below our expectations…We have since reduced direct labor to align cost with market conditions.” – CEO Brent Yeagy .
- “We expect sequential growth in Parts & Services through Q2, Q3 and Q4.” – Chief Growth Officer Mike Pettit .
- “We’re collaborating [with UP.Labs] to build…an AI-powered equipment configuration tool…and parts intelligence to optimize inventory levels.” – Mike Pettit .
What Went Wrong
- Transportation Solutions demand weakened materially; segment net sales fell 26.3% YoY and posted a $(9.8)M operating loss; gross margin compressed to 2.4% from 13.4% .
- Labor overexposure and poor fixed-cost absorption as anticipated quick-turn equipment demand failed to materialize late in the quarter; gross margin fell to 5.0% at the consolidated level .
- Tariff-related uncertainty led customers to delay equipment investments, driving guidance reductions for FY25 and muted near-term order flow; backlog down 32% YoY .
Financial Results
Summary Financials (GAAP and Adjusted)
Actual vs Consensus (Q1 2025)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment Performance (Quarterly)
KPIs
Notes: Backlog ended Q1 2025 at ~$1.2B (seq +5%, YoY −32%) .
Guidance Changes
Management attributed reductions to weaker demand and tariff-related uncertainty inhibiting customers’ CapEx decisions .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “While tariff-related uncertainty has caused customers to delay equipment investment decisions, it’s important to highlight the growth in our Parts & Services segment.” – CEO Brent Yeagy .
- “We doubled upfit volumes in Q1…added customers to TaaS…over 1,000 trailers deployed.” – Chief Growth Officer Mike Pettit .
- “We’ve taken action to right-size direct labor and production support costs.” – CFO Pat Keslin .
- “Our manufacturing footprint is almost entirely U.S.-based and 95% of materials are sourced domestically.” – CEO Brent Yeagy .
Q&A Highlights
- Margin trajectory and decrementals: CFO noted commodity pricing pressures embedded in FY guide; Q1 margin weakness tied to sudden demand drop and labor imbalance late in quarter, now right-sized .
- Parts & Services outlook: Management expects sequential revenue growth through Q2–Q4 and high-teens EBITDA for the year despite Q1 mix pressure .
- TaaS adoption: Fleet now “just over 1,000” units with 20–25 engaged customers; capabilities expanding alongside demand .
- Deliveries underpinning Q2 guide: Slight step-up in trailer and truck body shipments; nothing “heroic” implied .
- Liquidity: ~$310M liquidity (cash + revolver); capital allocation flexible across CapEx, dividend, buybacks, TaaS investments .
- H2 EPS positive assumption: Based on cost actions and stabilization rather than demand recovery; assumes uncertainty does not worsen .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 miss vs Street: Revenue $380.9M vs $409.85M*, adjusted EPS $(0.58) vs $(0.28)* .
- FY 2025 consensus sits below guidance: Revenue $1.55B* vs company ~$1.8B; normalized EPS $(1.97)* vs company $(0.85)–$(0.35), implying Street is more cautious than management .
- Near-term estimate revisions likely reflect reduced FY guide and Q2 loss guidance; watch for Parts & Services/TaaS scaling to temper downside in out-quarters .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Cycle trough dynamics: Orders have contracted for eight consecutive quarters with backlog down 32% YoY; tariff uncertainty is inhibiting CapEx and delaying purchases .
- Guidance reset: FY25 revenue cut to ~$1.8B and adjusted EPS to $(0.85)–$(0.35); Q2 guided loss of $(0.25)–$(0.35) with $420–$460M revenue .
- Cost actions: Labor and SG&A right-sizing executed; management expects H2 modestly positive EPS without assuming demand recovery, contingent on uncertainty not worsening .
- Strategic buffer: Parts & Services/TaaS provide recurring revenue and resilience; upfit growth and tech integrations (TrailerHawk.ai, UP.Labs) are structurally positive .
- Legal overhang improved: Court reduced punitive damages; Q1 GAAP EPS benefited from $342M gain; appeals ongoing, but capital allocation priorities remain intact .
- Trading implications: Near-term sentiment tied to tariff/regulatory clarity and order stabilization; upside optionality if uncertainty subsides and H2 volumes stabilize at right-sized cost base .
- Medium-term thesis: If FY25 shipments undercut replacement, fleet aging sets up catch-up demand; Wabash’s domestic footprint and services platform should leverage any manufacturing-led freight rebound .